Does Alternative Sentencing Reduce Recidivism? A Preliminary Analysis
نویسنده
چکیده
Traditional sentencing in America by the way of mass incarceration is a three-fold failure: it does not deter crime, it institutionalizes the inmates and it does so at an incredible cost to the state. There are alternative sentencing measures that can be implemented, and have been done so in various states, but there are not enough statistics that show alternative sanctions will reduce recidivism. But do alternative sentencing programs reduce recidivism as compared to traditional sentencing? This paper is dedicated to discovering the relative efficacy of alternative sentencing by comparing the rates of recidivism between communities that do and do not implement alternative sentencing. Alternative sentencing is enticing because it theoretically reduces recidivism through allowing the offenders to avoid institutionalization and concordantly become a contributing member of society, while drastically reducing corrections costs. It is possible that the evidence will not be able to reject the null hypothesis, which is alternative sentencing does not reduce recidivism compared to alternative sentencing, but it is highly probable that alternative sentencing does not increase recidivism, and when you combine that realization with the essentially guaranteed drastic reduction of costs, it would seem prudent for states to at least give alternative sentencing a test run.
منابع مشابه
Specific Deterrence Revisited: a Quasi-experiment on Sentence Severity and Recidivism
Title of Document: SPECIFIC DETERRENCE REVISITED: A QUASI-EXPERIMENT ON SENTENCE SEVERITY AND RECIDIVISM Elizabeth Wiemers, Master of Arts, 2006 Directed By: Professor Shawn D. Bushway, Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice This paper examines the utility of using a unique variation produced by a ruling in the Maryland sentencing guidelines as an instrumental variable in future researc...
متن کاملAlternative Sentencing & Strategies for Successful Prisoner Reentry
Executive Summary Nationally, more than two million people are serving time in prison on any given day. Missouri ranks eighth in the nation in terms of imprisonment and has experienced substantial growth in incarceration over the past two decades. The reality of mass incarceration and the accruing cost of corrections have led many states to consider implementing alternatives to traditional inca...
متن کاملEvidence - Based Sentencing and the Scientific Rationalization of Discrimination Sonja
This paper critiques, on legal and empirical grounds, the growing trend of basing criminal sentences on actuarial recidivism risk prediction instruments that include demographic and socioeconomic variables. I argue that this practice violates the Equal Protection Clause and is bad policy: an explicit embrace of otherwise-condemned discrimination, sanitized by scientific language. To demonstrate...
متن کاملSentencing Female Offenders in the Magistrate's Court: Preliminary Report on a Pilot Study1
IN AUSTRALIA, WHERE SENTENCING GUIDELINES ARE UNCOMMON, THE SEX of the offender is not officially a relevant factor in sentencing. However, as Fox and Freiberg (1985) note in their text on sentencing in Victoria, a bias in favour of women is 'well entrenched'. Numerous cases are cited in which the courts have stated that it was appropriate to apply a 'lower tariff for females' (p. 465). Appeals...
متن کاملRisk Assessment in Criminal Sentencing.
The past several years have seen a surge of interest in using risk assessment in criminal sentencing, both to reduce recidivism by incapacitating or treating high-risk offenders and to reduce prison populations by diverting low-risk offenders from prison. We begin by sketching jurisprudential theories of sentencing, distinguishing those that rely on risk assessment from those that preclude it. ...
متن کامل